I agree with Victor. This technology seems more suited for propulsion directly rather than use the compressed air to spin an alternator/generato
The description given said that 10 cylinders (I visualized scuba tanks) at 300bar represent 20Kw for 10 minutes, which translates to 3.3Kwh. Without many actual specifications, this system sounds bulky, complex and perhaps as heavy as regular AGM batteries. To be fair, the engineers were working towards solving different problems than we have with lead/acid energy storage, like the ability to stay "charged" for a decade in adverse conditions.
Fair winds,
Eric
SoCal
--- In electricboats@
>
>
>
> --- In electricboats@
> >
> > I'm alos a pilot, and and EAA member. I saw this link in the EAA newsletter and thought y'all might find it interesting too.
> > http://pepei.
> >
> > I hope that link works...
> >
> Hi Marilyn.
>
> Here in Norway it has been a lot of talk about compressed air as "battery". A small car made in India are using the system. It konsists of two 100liter carbo fiber tanks, with 300bar pressurised air. They had invented a new type of air motor. The plan was to produse a small car in France for the European market. The system should be suitable for boats too, if compressed air are available, or if you can produse it in an easy way.
>
> Victor
>
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch format to Traditional
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
No comments:
Post a Comment