I'm no expert, but I think older sodium technologies did require a heat source because the sodium needed to be molten. This one stressed "solid" so maybe that's the breakthrough.
Pat
--- In electricboats@yahoogroups.com, Kevin Pemberton <pembertonkevin@...> wrote:
>
> correct me if I am wrong, but doesn't sodium require a heat source?
>
> Kevin Pemberton
>
> On 06/08/2013 05:42 AM, stmbtwle wrote:
> > That sounds like a great advancement, but it seems to me that the
> > future is going to be in sodium, not lithium. Lithium is lighter and
> > probably "better", but it's also relatively rare and expensive. Sodium
> > is common and cheap. If we're ever going to have electric vehicles
> > (including boats) we're going to have to have an affordable battery.
> >
> > Willie
>
>
> --
> Committing murder in exchange for lifestyle
> makes you a "thug" not a "Rights Activist"
>
| Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (4) |
No comments:
Post a Comment