Oops. The new battery uses sulfur instead of lithium. No sodium. Sorry for the confusion.
--- In electricboats@yahoogroups.com, "greenpjs04" <forums@...> wrote:
>
> I'm no expert, but I think older sodium technologies did require a heat source because the sodium needed to be molten. This one stressed "solid" so maybe that's the breakthrough.
> Pat
>
>
> --- In electricboats@yahoogroups.com, Kevin Pemberton <pembertonkevin@> wrote:
> >
> > correct me if I am wrong, but doesn't sodium require a heat source?
> >
> > Kevin Pemberton
> >
> > On 06/08/2013 05:42 AM, stmbtwle wrote:
> > > That sounds like a great advancement, but it seems to me that the
> > > future is going to be in sodium, not lithium. Lithium is lighter and
> > > probably "better", but it's also relatively rare and expensive. Sodium
> > > is common and cheap. If we're ever going to have electric vehicles
> > > (including boats) we're going to have to have an affordable battery.
> > >
> > > Willie
> >
> >
> > --
> > Committing murder in exchange for lifestyle
> > makes you a "thug" not a "Rights Activist"
> >
>
| Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (6) |
No comments:
Post a Comment