Thursday, February 25, 2016

Re: [Electric Boats] Why gear reduction?

 

Diesel is just an energy storage technology, it competes with batteries. At least in my mind.

Electric is a good way to convert energy to forward movement, not sure about traditional props.

Flukes might be more efficient?

Sent from my iPhone

On Feb 24, 2016, at 21:58, 'james@electroprop.com' james@electroprop.com [electricboats] <electricboats@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

It used to be that electrics had to measure up to diesel to be considered viable.   Thats changing.  It now the diesel that has to prove itself against the electrics.   

Electrics can enable faster sailboats with lighter systems weights.   Hybrids can outperform diesel in every aspect but most notably range.   In every other aspect of sailing electrics rule the day.   

Now its a matter for the world to catch up.  Diesel now has a new master. 

Electrics are here and it is only a matter of time before they dominate the marketplace.   

With average single digit efficiencies of diesel aboard a sailboat its time to realize just how much a dinasaur that diesel has become.   

Wait to you see what is coming next to the world of sailing!

James Lambden
Electroprop
6 Harbor Way #226
Santa Barbara, CA
93109


On Feb 24, 2016, at 8:28 PM, 'james@electroprop.com' james@electroprop.com [electricboats] <electricboats@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

A motor,s power is directly proportionate to rpm.   To make power you have to make rpm.   But propellers work best the slowest you can turn them for the desired result   Hence the need for reduction

To achieve the same amount of power at low rpm with a direct drive, the motor has to be huge in comparison.   A geared system can be 1/4 of the weight of a direct drive system. 




James Lambden
Electroprop
6 Harbor Way #226
Santa Barbara, CA
93109


On Feb 24, 2016, at 6:33 PM, 'Jason (Electric Boats) Taylor' jt.yahoo@jtaylor.ca [electricboats] <electricboats@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

Short answer: Heat,efficiency and cost. 

Heat
The motor I use, the ME0913 is open-frame air cooled. The motor has a cooling fan on it, connected to the output shaft on the opposite side. At lower RPM, it doesn't move enough air to cool it under heavy load. 

Efficiency
The motor and controller are both more efficient at higher RPMs. The motor may have full torque at lower RPM, but those Nm cost more per watt. As a sailor, I'm a cheap bastard. 

Cost
See my earlier post about the magnomatics pseudo direct drive gear motor. That would be able to directly drive a prop shaft at very low rpm. There is also the ST37 from Solomon Tech that does something similar but with machined planetary gears. These are very expensive compared to belt and pulley or even industrial fixed gear reducers. There was a vendor here, Advanced Marine Electric Propulsion, who had a direct drive offering but he used lower voltage systems which meant higher amperage on the battery bank. This means bigger, more expensive cabling, bigger battery banks in order to deal with the increased demand efficiently (peukert effect). Again, I'm a cheap bastard. I don't want to spend money where it doesn't directly benefit my sailing. But I also hate spending money more than once on something, like replacing a burnt, overloaded motor. 

Cheers,

/Jason

--
Jason Taylor
v:514-815-8204

On Feb 22, 2016, at 9:36 AM, johnrhines@gmail.com [electricboats] <electricboats@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

Jason,


Thanks for the detailed reply, but I'm am still confused.  Let me ask the question a different way.  You said to get a cruise speed of 4.7 kts with optimal conditions, your prop spins at 650rpm.  With a gear reduction of 2.55, that means your motor is turning 1657rpm.  Since electric motors have full torque at all rpms, what is the problem with spinning the motor at 650rpm and eliminating the gear reduction?  Is it just a measure of efficiency?  How would you calculate the load on a motor at 650rpm versus 1657rpm.

Thanks,
John

__._,_.___

Posted by: Dirk Harms-Merbitz <grasswood@icloud.com>
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (31)

.

__,_._,___

No comments:

Post a Comment