Re: [electricboats] Re Power for SV/Retreat Time Catamaran

One reason you might choose this particular kit is to get the water-cooled motor.  I think if you want to be able to motor continuously at speed you really need more robust cooling than the air cooled units will give you.  Also at more modest speeds you will not be pushing the system so hard.   But I don't think there is enough battery reserve here. 

If I am reading the description correctly you will have a 72V 200AH AGM bank in each hull?  That will be 100AH usable capacity (50% depth of discharge).  I am sure there are some Catamaran dynamics that make the comparison problematic but for my 13,000 lb monohull 100AH of usable capacity would get me about 10 miles at 5 knots.  That would not be good enough for my purposes.  Is a 26,000 lb cat like two 13,000 monohulls?  Probably not and with the higher hull speed of 40'LWL maybe you would do better?  Still seems like too short a range for practical purposes. 

Regardless of how you divide up the battery banks you still have a total capacity (with 24 batteries) of 28,800 Whrs.  But with AGM you have 50% depth of discharge so it's 14,400Whrs usable which is marginal I think. 

I would consider running at 48V and configuring the batteries for 4S3P on each hull for two 48V 300AH banks.   Still the same Whrs total - that's the good thing about looking at it in Whrs.   The motor would be 12kW at that voltage and 2500RPM max.   I thought the ME1616 is 96 V max anyway?  So 144V banks won't be an option? 

Then again, with a CAT it might be nice to be able to run the port side from the starboard battery and higher voltage would be better for that.  But I am not so keen on the high voltage.    But it can be done.  You still have the same total Whrs and that's what the range is based on. 

Prop speed depends on the size of the props.  I have an 18" prop with a 3:1 reduction for 800 RPM max.   This has been an excellent match for me.   Bigger and slower prop will be better.  You have 19" so I would target a prop speed of 600 to 900 RPM.    This may be another reason to go 48V because max motor RPM will be 2500.  At 72 it's 3600 RPM?   That means 4:1 to get the prop rotation where you want it.  That may be more difficult to come up with regarding reduction gear parts.   You can do 3:1 pretty simply though I am not sure what those limits might be with the Thunderstruck reduction units.  

But it also depends on pitch.  You say 19deg pitch?  That is typically expressed in inches of pitch.  How many inches will the boat move forward for one rev of the prop.   Can you translate that 19deg to inches of pitch?  If that's what it was, 19 inches, then it's a pretty big pitch which also means slow RPM.    My 18" prop is set to a theoretical pitch of 13.5".   It's a feathering prop so the behavior is not exactly the same.   But if it was 19" of pitch I would need an even slower RPM.  Like 600. 

Lots of variables to work with...


Dan Pfeiffer

On 2022-01-30 4:24 pm, Carsten via groups.io wrote:

 

Is it a sail cat or just engine powered, John ??

 

I'm a bit confused, why you need 2x18KW for a cat

 

 

On Saturday, 29 January 2022, 14:26:19 CET, john winterrowd via groups.io <sailorboy55577=yahoo.com@groups.io> wrote:

 

 

Greetings my fellow Electrosailors, the day has come after nearly a year of waiting for chips, motors, pumps, fans and now the final details need to be identified, she is getting repowered with Thunderstruck 18 KW kits.



Facts and figures for SV/Retreat Time Catamaran
LOA 44 '
Water line 40'
Beam 20
Draft 3.5
Propeller 19 " Diameter 3 blade
Pitch 19 degree
Displacement 26,000 lbs.
Battery bank per hull consists of 12 group 31 AGM Duracell 100AH

Before I commit to keeping the 144-volt banks, I am asking the group to consider a few thoughts,

Sacrificing a few amps by dividing each battery bank in half operating at 72 volts, this way I may be able to parallel them together for higher total amp hours? Or have two separate banks for redundancy charging would be done on 110 volts instead of 220 volts.

Prop speed remains unknown to achieve at best half of hull speed, this is where I could use your help, without the variables of current and wind, I'm looking for a laboratory answer, this is to determine what gear reductions would best suit this vessels propulsion and efficiency. 

https://vicprop.com/displacement_size_new.php
Any help or advice will greatly be appreciated as Thunderstruck is planning to program and tune and ship next week. 
Thanks John