It's still sounds like a good metric, just that there are classes of boat-use that need to be factored in.
Motor power / boat mass (specific power of the whole boat) and (usable, not nominal) battery capacity / boat mass (specific energy storage capacity of the whole boat) allows us to plot drive systems and storage systems from many different boats on a simple 2D chart. I expect clusters will appear and these clusters will indicate the different use-cases, whether cruising, work-boat, club-racers, trolling bass-boats, etc.
You could also look at the ratio of capacity to motor power. As it falls below 1:1 (smaller battery banks), you will want to look for onboard charging sources -- whatever the method, or shorter trips between shore-charging.
The typical rules-of-thumb for systems on this list revolve around 1kw/tonne motor power and 1kWh/tonne battery capacity for most conversions.
There are exceptions to either side of that, but I am willing to wager that these deviations have reasoned use-cases behind them. And I believe that all of these use-cases will form distinct clusters in the above-proposed chart.
Such a chart would very likely help keep things in perspective for the prospective convert, and go a long way to helping them make an informed choice.
/Jason
I can testify that 5000 Whrs is grossly inadequate for a 40,000# boat.My dream is for two of those 20 kWhr Li Ion fork lift batteries packs for $20,000 but budget reality will probably force me to just get another 8 pack of Trojan T-125s for $1000 which will be twice as good as what I have now but still inadequate. I think I would be good with a total of 20 kWhrs of storage though, which is .5 Whr/# in my case. However I get about 25 kWhrs/day from my solar panels which definitely factors into the equation. So if you're operationg strictly off your batteries, 1 Whr/# is probably a good benchmark to shoot for but if you have another energy source such as solar or a genset, I'd say 1 Whr/# is a bit heavy and the .5 Whr/# is a more like it.That's just my opinion and I would also add that's when it comes to energy storage capacity, more is always better.CarterFrom: Arby Bernt <arbybernt@yahoo.com>
To: "electricboats@yahoogroups.com" <electricboats@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, April 15, 2013 2:51 AM
Subject: [Electric Boats] Proper battery capacity
We have a nice rule of thumb for power, about 1kw per ton of displacement.
I'd like to propose a battery standard.
How does 1wH per pound of displacement work?
Our test boat, a 7000lb Ericson 27 has 9600wH, and is never worked. A 13000lb Rawson 30 I converted has 12kwH of power, and it gets worked.
Other Systems..?
Arby Bernt
Advanced Marine Electric Propulsion.
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/electricboats/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/electricboats/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
electricboats-digest@yahoogroups.com
electricboats-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
electricboats-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
__._,_.___
| Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (60) |
.
__,_._,___
No comments:
Post a Comment