Learn more about our updated Terms of Service

newarmyguitar24@gmail.com  Every couple of years, we update our Terms of Service. We wanted to let you know ahead of time that the next update will be on July 30, 2026. These changes won’t affect the way you use our services, but they should help make it easier for you to understand what to expect from Google — and what we expect from you — as you use our services. You can review the new terms here. If you’re based in the European Economic Area (EEA) or Switzerland, we’ve also provided a summary of the key changes to the EEA version of our terms. At a glance, here’s what this update means for you: In general: We added a section to help you better understand why our services may access the internet when not actively engaged, to encourage you to check your Internet service plan and your device and network settings, as each of those may affect your costs. We updated and clarified our Settling disputes, governing law, and courts section. We make it clearer how various sections in our terms relate to each other. If you’re based in the EEA: In addition to the changes in the In general section, we updated various sections to reflect the latest EEA laws and regulations that apply to our services, including: Google’s obligation to make legally-required updates to our digital content, services, and goods. A new, online “withdrawal button” in the EEA instructions on withdrawal section. We also removed the Handling requests for your data section, because we’re centralizing our data disclosure language on our main data disclosure policy page. If you’re based outside the EEA:  In addition to the changes in the In general section, we added new disclosures and disclaimers, including ones about AI outputs. If you’re based in India, we also added new reporting language about our obligations if you violate applicable law. If you’re a parent or guardian, and you allow your child to use the services, please review the updates to our terms with your child and help them decide whether they need to make any changes to their account. Please remember that these terms apply to you and you’re responsible for your child’s activity on the services. If you don’t agree to the new terms, you should remove your content and stop using the services. You can also end your relationship with us at any time, without penalty, by closing your Google Account. Thank you for using Google services!  © 2026 Google LLC 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043  You have received this email to update you about important changes to Google’s Terms of Service.

Re: [electricboats] Pocket Trawler Electrification

Where you will find your configuration wanting is scenarios where you need to stern to move port or starboard to get away from or come towards something like a dock.  You can drive both pods full speed in opposite directions and all that will do is torque the boat, pointing the front of the boat into or away from the dock.  So the only thing you really have that might work in that scenario to get the stern to swing in is that bow thruster opposing that torque which would have the net effect of pushing the stern in.  Without that bow thruster, may as well throw a line to someone on the dock.

So yes, that bow thruster is an essential part of your plan.

 

From: electricboats@groups.io <electricboats@groups.io> On Behalf Of maaseidvaag via groups.io
Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2026 12:40 PM
To: electricboats@groups.io
Subject: Re: [electricboats] Pocket Trawler Electrification

 

Thanks all for all the feedback and insight.

 

The pods are completely independent of each other with their own controls, motor controller, etc., and can be run with differential thrust.  A failure of any component in one drive won't impact the other, so I should have get-home capabilities.  They will share three batteries that will typically run in parallel with each other but will be able to be isolated if needed.

 

As to low-speed maneuverability, I will have the differential thrust of the two pods and the front mounted Vetus bow thruster which I believe is rated at about 3000 watts.  It's the smallest they make.  Anything longer than a half second blip of the joystick sends the bow sideways in a hurry.

 

Currently, reverse rudder authority is basically zero, with a pronounced prop-walk of the stern to port.  With the new pods I'll should no longer have any prop-walk and can use either differential thrust or the bow thruster to get the boat pointing where I want it.

 

I don't think rudder authority going forward will be an issue either.  I've inserted a very rough image of the anticipated arrangement of the pods versus the existing prop indicated by the red lines.  I will fair the aft end of the full keel to both seal up the shaft log (that will remain embedded in the keel) and smooth the water flow off the trailing edge of the keel.  I'll mount the pods as tight as I can to the centerline, which should put their wash down each side of the existing rudder.  Currently thinking about 4" of clearance between the prop tip and the keel, which is the same as the minimum distance from the top of the prop to the bottom of the hull.

 

As always, all ideas and advice are greatly appreciated.

 

Lars

 

For reference, the current prop in red is 17"x12", and the pod props are 12.5" x 8.3"

 

Actual picture of existing prop and rudder are the second image

 

Re: [electricboats] Pocket Trawler Electrification

Agree for large ships however these are 6kw not over 100kw. The boat is 10m or less not ten times thst.

I could see steering through differential thrust first off. Standard for catamarans. Spining the boat on its axis almost. At low speeds the rudders have low to no effect. If you want rudder effect from prop wash I assume the prop and rudder must be close to each other and indeed  that is what shown in ship design texts. Especially close with fishtail rudder types.

i am now starting to see the situation. Pods fixed underneath. No additional skeg to protect them and their props. Hmmm that sounds like a lot of care needs to happen to not hit one or more props. Even aluminium props get mangled blades.

I looked at pod drives but always had a method to lift them up. Indeed steer them. I sail shallow waters and my draft is 250mm which is a lot less than a pod.

Best regards

Lee Eldridge

0427874796

On 1 Feb 2026, at 21:52, Carsten via groups.io <Carstensemail=yahoo.com@groups.io> wrote:



Hi Lars,

Did you get the point, that fixed pod needs a separate rudder for each engine ?

I worked with big tankers for the Potomac River 24 years ago, in Hyundai Shipyard, Korea.

Dual engines, with 70 meters, hull 280 meters, fixed engines running both ways.

Rudders in the flow of the prop stream.

(Means two rudders).

Make your own design in a proper way.

Just an input...

Carsten

On Friday, 30 January 2026 at 22:25:47 CET, maaseidvaag via groups.io <maaseidvaag=yahoo.com@groups.io> wrote:

Hi Carsten & Paul,

 

Yes, fixed pods mounted so the props are in the same vertical plane as the current prop.  The side-mount controls just refer to the controls that came "free" with the purchase, as opposed to the top-mount dual control.  The dual control would be ideal I guess, but it does provide a single point of failure in a system that otherwise provides complete separation and redundancy.  The image below is near-enough to scale showing where the pods will hang on the hull.  My plan is to tuck them in as tight as reasonable against the full keel to 1) help protect them from striking anything, and 2) to keep the prop wash as close as possible to the single rudder that will remain.  I'm not worried about low-speed maneuverability as the boat does have a bow thruster.

 

Inside the hull above the pod mounting locations I will laminate in watertight bulkheads and covers to protect against flooding should I ever tear a pod clean off the hull.  Highly unlikely in the Great Lakes with a boat that draws 2.5', but easy enough to do and I'll be adding thickness on the inside of the hull where the pods mount, so a few more pieces while the epoxy is mixed won't be much trouble.

 

Lars

 

 

<mceclip0.png>

Re: [electricboats] Pocket Trawler Electrification

Hi Lars,

Did you get the point, that fixed pod needs a separate rudder for each engine ?

I worked with big tankers for the Potomac River 24 years ago, in Hyundai Shipyard, Korea.

Dual engines, with 70 meters, hull 280 meters, fixed engines running both ways.

Rudders in the flow of the prop stream.

(Means two rudders).

Make your own design in a proper way.

Just an input...

Carsten

On Friday, 30 January 2026 at 22:25:47 CET, maaseidvaag via groups.io <maaseidvaag=yahoo.com@groups.io> wrote:

Hi Carsten & Paul,

 

Yes, fixed pods mounted so the props are in the same vertical plane as the current prop.  The side-mount controls just refer to the controls that came "free" with the purchase, as opposed to the top-mount dual control.  The dual control would be ideal I guess, but it does provide a single point of failure in a system that otherwise provides complete separation and redundancy.  The image below is near-enough to scale showing where the pods will hang on the hull.  My plan is to tuck them in as tight as reasonable against the full keel to 1) help protect them from striking anything, and 2) to keep the prop wash as close as possible to the single rudder that will remain.  I'm not worried about low-speed maneuverability as the boat does have a bow thruster.

 

Inside the hull above the pod mounting locations I will laminate in watertight bulkheads and covers to protect against flooding should I ever tear a pod clean off the hull.  Highly unlikely in the Great Lakes with a boat that draws 2.5', but easy enough to do and I'll be adding thickness on the inside of the hull where the pods mount, so a few more pieces while the epoxy is mixed won't be much trouble.

 

Lars

 

 

Re: [electricboats] Pocket Trawler Electrification

Again great feedback. 

Agree having rudder in prop wash is not beneficial for regular rudders (multiple references for this conclusion). However for fishtail type rudder used on really slow boats (barge and canal type boats), having prop wash adds a huge facility, reminiscent of bow thrusters.

In general it appears that props in "clean" water work better. Assume suitable depth and distance from hull.

I am now seeing 90 degree turns being possible in a sailing boat length. I have played with my rudder either going straight down and laying out aft. The latter provides huge steerage at low speeds - enough to highly stress the tiller when in reverse.

Best Regards

Lee@vombatus.com.au
0427874796

On 1 Feb 2026, at 7:27 am, maaseidvaag via groups.io <maaseidvaag=yahoo.com@groups.io> wrote:

Hi Matt - I did test steerage this last season with having the boat at cruising speed, going into neutral, and then applying vary degrees of turn on the wheel.  I didn't perceive any dramatic loss of control and could still do a complete 360 degree circle while coasting in neutral, probably in about 3 boat lengths by the (very slow) end of the circle.  With power on I can do the circle inside 2 boat lengths.

 

One hypothesis that will remain just a hypothesis is that straight ahead cruising might slightly benefit from not having the rudder directly in the prop wash.  Probably not an experiment that has been run, but maybe?  

 

Thanks for the feedback,

Lars

Re: [electricboats] Pocket Trawler Electrification

Thanks for the link.  I will configure them as outturning and call it good.

 

Tiny Boat Nation did confirm that I need to send my control and display back to be programmed for reverse rotation.  No charge other than shipping, and they have the LH prop in stock despite it being missing from the website.

 

Thanks - Lars

_._,_._,_

---

Groups.io Links:

You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#32998) | Reply to Group | Reply to Sender | Mute This Topic | New Topic
Your Subscription | Contact Group Owner | Unsubscribe [newarmyguitar24@gmail.com]

_._,_._,_

Re: [electricboats] Pocket Trawler Electrification

Hi Matt - I did test steerage this last season with having the boat at cruising speed, going into neutral, and then applying vary degrees of turn on the wheel.  I didn't perceive any dramatic loss of control and could still do a complete 360 degree circle while coasting in neutral, probably in about 3 boat lengths by the (very slow) end of the circle.  With power on I can do the circle inside 2 boat lengths.

 

One hypothesis that will remain just a hypothesis is that straight ahead cruising might slightly benefit from not having the rudder directly in the prop wash.  Probably not an experiment that has been run, but maybe?  

 

Thanks for the feedback,

Lars

_._,_._,_

---

Groups.io Links:

You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#32997) | Reply to Group | Reply to Sender | Mute This Topic | New Topic
Your Subscription | Contact Group Owner | Unsubscribe [newarmyguitar24@gmail.com]

_._,_._,_

Re: [electricboats] Pocket Trawler Electrification

Thanks all for all the feedback and insight.

 

The pods are completely independent of each other with their own controls, motor controller, etc., and can be run with differential thrust.  A failure of any component in one drive won't impact the other, so I should have get-home capabilities.  They will share three batteries that will typically run in parallel with each other but will be able to be isolated if needed.

 

As to low-speed maneuverability, I will have the differential thrust of the two pods and the front mounted Vetus bow thruster which I believe is rated at about 3000 watts.  It's the smallest they make.  Anything longer than a half second blip of the joystick sends the bow sideways in a hurry.

 

Currently, reverse rudder authority is basically zero, with a pronounced prop-walk of the stern to port.  With the new pods I'll should no longer have any prop-walk and can use either differential thrust or the bow thruster to get the boat pointing where I want it.

 

I don't think rudder authority going forward will be an issue either.  I've inserted a very rough image of the anticipated arrangement of the pods versus the existing prop indicated by the red lines.  I will fair the aft end of the full keel to both seal up the shaft log (that will remain embedded in the keel) and smooth the water flow off the trailing edge of the keel.  I'll mount the pods as tight as I can to the centerline, which should put their wash down each side of the existing rudder.  Currently thinking about 4" of clearance between the prop tip and the keel, which is the same as the minimum distance from the top of the prop to the bottom of the hull.

 

As always, all ideas and advice are greatly appreciated.

 

Lars

 

For reference, the current prop in red is 17"x12", and the pod props are 12.5" x 8.3"

 

Actual picture of existing prop and rudder are the second image

 

Re: [electricboats] Pocket Trawler Electrification

Unconventional but I think it might be alright. Sailboats have steerage at basically any speed without prop wash. Albeit with a relatively very large rudder. I built a 20' wide trimaran last summer with rotating pods only about 3' apart. With the pods locked straight you can turn the boat just about on axis, which is much better than expected. 

Matt Foley 

Sunlight Conversions

Perpetual Energy, LLC

201-914-0466

sunlightconversions.com

instagram.com/sunlightconversions/

youtube/sunlightconversions

ABYC Certified Marine 

Electrical Technician 

On Friday, January 30, 2026, 9:15 PM, Myles Twete via groups.io <matwete=comcast.net@groups.io> wrote:

Wow---this seems risky.

 

You're saying that you are going to keep a single rudder arrangement but use 2 fixed pods.

As I see it, you'll have several situations where turning response will be pretty wanting.

I'd be concerned about rudder response in docking/undocking or generally anytime moving slowly and perhaps other scenarios, again, mostly at slow speeds.

 

I've never seen anyone do this before---when going twin prop, either you go with twin rudder or have the props steerable.  And the rudders ideally want to be configured as balanced as feasible (having some area in front of the axis of rotation so the torque stresses are minimized with prop thrust.  Even more ideally, flat rudders replaced with aerodynamic profiles are growing in popularity---Dan Pence did this a couple years ago with the rudder on his electric launch "Ginger", one of the first 2 or 3 electric boat conversions done in recent decades and appearing on www.evalbum.com .  The rudder efficiency was improved noticeably.

 

I helped build a 40ft steamboat cca 2000 that was twin-15hp steam engine powered.  Behind each prop we had a rudder.  Steering was mostly a breeze and on many trips I manned the engines and direction controls.  The ability to drive one prop FWD while reversing the other prop allowed really tight turning in docking.  This would have been seriously hampered if that boat had a single rudder---I actually can't even imagine it.

 

Anyone else with twin-screw experience want to add?

 

-MylesT

 

 

 

From: electricboats@groups.io <electricboats@groups.io> On Behalf Of maaseidvaag via groups.io
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2026 1:30 PM
To: electricboats@groups.io
Subject: Re: [electricboats] Pocket Trawler Electrification

 

I should add, the rudder as pictured in my last post is as the boat was originally constructed.  It was enlarged by a previous owner and is about 50% larger with area added both on the leading edge and trailing edge.  I may be proven wrong, but I don't believe I'll have any problems with sufficient rudder authority after the prop wash is moved off the centerline and to the pods.   And, as mentioned, I have the cheat-code in the form of a bow thruster, which does seem like overkill on a 27' boat.

 

Lars

Re: [electricboats] Pocket Trawler Electrification

Through this thread, I was assuming that there would be separate controls for each of the two pods.

You could almost make the argument that if you had differential thrust available through separate motor controls, you don't necessarily need the rudders.

I have experience with 3 different twin engine boats.  My current boat is a trawler with twin inboard engines.  There are twin rudders - each located behind the prop.  My previous boat had a similar setup.  The one before that was twin I/O's - so no rudders, but steerable engines.  The catch is that the I/O lower unit is located at the very back of the boat.   The other two boats had the props forward of the stern a little bit.  That made a HUGE difference.   While the I/O's were steerable, they were tied together (for steering).   I could use differential thrust - but that worked best when the wheel was centered and the I/O units were straight.  Trying to spin a boat when both of the props are at the back edge of the boat, and close together, is a challenge.   Modern I/O twin engine boats typically have separate steering, and fly-by-wire.  It's EXPENSIVE, but the software allows you to cant the engines in opposite directions to crab the boat sideways.  It's just plain cheating...  LOL!

On my current trawler - it is WONDERFUL to have twin engines!  This makes docking SOOO much easier than with a single engine and rudder!  However, my current marina has a narrow distance between my dock and the dock behind me (the fairway).  To back out of the slip, I use differential thrust only.   To get into the slip, between the competing forces of wind and current - I have found that I am most successful if I maintain a little headway, steer with the rudders, and only use differential thrust once I have crossed the entrance to the slip.   I initially tried pulling into the slip with only differential thrust.  But by the time I stopped the boat, and turned it, either the wind or the current (!! which is MUCH harder to see) would blow me off course.

On a couple of occasions, I have needed to limp back to the dock with only one running engine ("I only need one engine to get home - that's why I have two!").   In those cases I was very lucky to be able to steer into the slip with just the one engine, and no option of differential thrust.   This is the case where I would say you can "almost" make the argument that you don't need a rudder if you have differential thrust.

That having been said - I think I've seen at least one or two boats that had two props and no rudder(s) at all.

Good luck!!!

John

On Friday, January 30, 2026 at 08:15:29 PM CST, Myles Twete via groups.io <matwete=comcast.net@groups.io> wrote:

Wow---this seems risky.

 

You're saying that you are going to keep a single rudder arrangement but use 2 fixed pods.

As I see it, you'll have several situations where turning response will be pretty wanting.

I'd be concerned about rudder response in docking/undocking or generally anytime moving slowly and perhaps other scenarios, again, mostly at slow speeds.

 

I've never seen anyone do this before---when going twin prop, either you go with twin rudder or have the props steerable.  And the rudders ideally want to be configured as balanced as feasible (having some area in front of the axis of rotation so the torque stresses are minimized with prop thrust.  Even more ideally, flat rudders replaced with aerodynamic profiles are growing in popularity---Dan Pence did this a couple years ago with the rudder on his electric launch "Ginger", one of the first 2 or 3 electric boat conversions done in recent decades and appearing on www.evalbum.com .  The rudder efficiency was improved noticeably.

 

I helped build a 40ft steamboat cca 2000 that was twin-15hp steam engine powered.  Behind each prop we had a rudder.  Steering was mostly a breeze and on many trips I manned the engines and direction controls.  The ability to drive one prop FWD while reversing the other prop allowed really tight turning in docking.  This would have been seriously hampered if that boat had a single rudder---I actually can't even imagine it.

 

Anyone else with twin-screw experience want to add?

 

-MylesT

 

 

 

From: electricboats@groups.io <electricboats@groups.io> On Behalf Of maaseidvaag via groups.io
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2026 1:30 PM
To: electricboats@groups.io
Subject: Re: [electricboats] Pocket Trawler Electrification

 

I should add, the rudder as pictured in my last post is as the boat was originally constructed.  It was enlarged by a previous owner and is about 50% larger with area added both on the leading edge and trailing edge.  I may be proven wrong, but I don't believe I'll have any problems with sufficient rudder authority after the prop wash is moved off the centerline and to the pods.   And, as mentioned, I have the cheat-code in the form of a bow thruster, which does seem like overkill on a 27' boat.

 

Lars

Re: [electricboats] Pocket Trawler Electrification

Lars, with the bigger rudder I think you will be fine, especially if you have given them NACA profile.

--
Regards,

Paul J. Thompson
IT Manager - Bathroom Direct
(W)09 913 3110 (Mob)021 275 5001 (txt only please)

On Sat, 31 Jan 2026, 15:15 Myles Twete via groups.io, <matwete=comcast.net@groups.io> wrote:

Wow---this seems risky.

 

You're saying that you are going to keep a single rudder arrangement but use 2 fixed pods.

As I see it, you'll have several situations where turning response will be pretty wanting.

I'd be concerned about rudder response in docking/undocking or generally anytime moving slowly and perhaps other scenarios, again, mostly at slow speeds.

 

I've never seen anyone do this before---when going twin prop, either you go with twin rudder or have the props steerable.  And the rudders ideally want to be configured as balanced as feasible (having some area in front of the axis of rotation so the torque stresses are minimized with prop thrust.  Even more ideally, flat rudders replaced with aerodynamic profiles are growing in popularity---Dan Pence did this a couple years ago with the rudder on his electric launch "Ginger", one of the first 2 or 3 electric boat conversions done in recent decades and appearing on www.evalbum.com .  The rudder efficiency was improved noticeably.

 

I helped build a 40ft steamboat cca 2000 that was twin-15hp steam engine powered.  Behind each prop we had a rudder.  Steering was mostly a breeze and on many trips I manned the engines and direction controls.  The ability to drive one prop FWD while reversing the other prop allowed really tight turning in docking.  This would have been seriously hampered if that boat had a single rudder---I actually can't even imagine it.

 

Anyone else with twin-screw experience want to add?

 

-MylesT

 

 

 

From: electricboats@groups.io <electricboats@groups.io> On Behalf Of maaseidvaag via groups.io
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2026 1:30 PM
To: electricboats@groups.io
Subject: Re: [electricboats] Pocket Trawler Electrification

 

I should add, the rudder as pictured in my last post is as the boat was originally constructed.  It was enlarged by a previous owner and is about 50% larger with area added both on the leading edge and trailing edge.  I may be proven wrong, but I don't believe I'll have any problems with sufficient rudder authority after the prop wash is moved off the centerline and to the pods.   And, as mentioned, I have the cheat-code in the form of a bow thruster, which does seem like overkill on a 27' boat.

 

Lars

_._,_._,_

---

Groups.io Links:

You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#32993) | Reply to Group | Reply to Sender | Mute This Topic | New Topic
Your Subscription | Contact Group Owner | Unsubscribe [newarmyguitar24@gmail.com]

_._,_._,_

Re: [electricboats] Pocket Trawler Electrification

Wow---this seems risky.

 

You're saying that you are going to keep a single rudder arrangement but use 2 fixed pods.

As I see it, you'll have several situations where turning response will be pretty wanting.

I'd be concerned about rudder response in docking/undocking or generally anytime moving slowly and perhaps other scenarios, again, mostly at slow speeds.

 

I've never seen anyone do this before---when going twin prop, either you go with twin rudder or have the props steerable.  And the rudders ideally want to be configured as balanced as feasible (having some area in front of the axis of rotation so the torque stresses are minimized with prop thrust.  Even more ideally, flat rudders replaced with aerodynamic profiles are growing in popularity---Dan Pence did this a couple years ago with the rudder on his electric launch "Ginger", one of the first 2 or 3 electric boat conversions done in recent decades and appearing on www.evalbum.com .  The rudder efficiency was improved noticeably.

 

I helped build a 40ft steamboat cca 2000 that was twin-15hp steam engine powered.  Behind each prop we had a rudder.  Steering was mostly a breeze and on many trips I manned the engines and direction controls.  The ability to drive one prop FWD while reversing the other prop allowed really tight turning in docking.  This would have been seriously hampered if that boat had a single rudder---I actually can't even imagine it.

 

Anyone else with twin-screw experience want to add?

 

-MylesT

 

 

 

From: electricboats@groups.io <electricboats@groups.io> On Behalf Of maaseidvaag via groups.io
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2026 1:30 PM
To: electricboats@groups.io
Subject: Re: [electricboats] Pocket Trawler Electrification

 

I should add, the rudder as pictured in my last post is as the boat was originally constructed.  It was enlarged by a previous owner and is about 50% larger with area added both on the leading edge and trailing edge.  I may be proven wrong, but I don't believe I'll have any problems with sufficient rudder authority after the prop wash is moved off the centerline and to the pods.   And, as mentioned, I have the cheat-code in the form of a bow thruster, which does seem like overkill on a 27' boat.

 

Lars

Re: [electricboats] Pocket Trawler Electrification

No the ePropulsion PODs are fixed. If you want lifting or rotation then there are the  "Navy" series which are outboard type legs. 

--
Regards,

Paul J. Thompson
IT Manager - Bathroom Direct
(W)09 913 3110 (Mob)21 275 5001 (txt only please)

On Sat, 31 Jan 2026, 12:51 Dan Pfeiffer via groups.io, <dan=pfeiffer.net@groups.io> wrote:

Can the pods rotate?  That would be handy.

Dan Pfeiffer

On 2026-01-30 4:29 pm, maaseidvaag via groups.io wrote:

I should add, the rudder as pictured in my last post is as the boat was originally constructed.  It was enlarged by a previous owner and is about 50% larger with area added both on the leading edge and trailing edge.  I may be proven wrong, but I don't believe I'll have any problems with sufficient rudder authority after the prop wash is moved off the centerline and to the pods.   And, as mentioned, I have the cheat-code in the form of a bow thruster, which does seem like overkill on a 27' boat.

 

Lars

_._,_._,_

---

Groups.io Links:

You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#32991) | Reply to Group | Reply to Sender | Mute This Topic | New Topic
Your Subscription | Contact Group Owner | Unsubscribe [newarmyguitar24@gmail.com]

_._,_._,_

Re: [electricboats] Pocket Trawler Electrification

Can the pods rotate?  That would be handy.

Dan Pfeiffer

On 2026-01-30 4:29 pm, maaseidvaag via groups.io wrote:

I should add, the rudder as pictured in my last post is as the boat was originally constructed.  It was enlarged by a previous owner and is about 50% larger with area added both on the leading edge and trailing edge.  I may be proven wrong, but I don't believe I'll have any problems with sufficient rudder authority after the prop wash is moved off the centerline and to the pods.   And, as mentioned, I have the cheat-code in the form of a bow thruster, which does seem like overkill on a 27' boat.

 

Lars

Re: [electricboats] Pocket Trawler Electrification

I should add, the rudder as pictured in my last post is as the boat was originally constructed.  It was enlarged by a previous owner and is about 50% larger with area added both on the leading edge and trailing edge.  I may be proven wrong, but I don't believe I'll have any problems with sufficient rudder authority after the prop wash is moved off the centerline and to the pods.   And, as mentioned, I have the cheat-code in the form of a bow thruster, which does seem like overkill on a 27' boat.

 

Lars

_._,_._,_

---

Groups.io Links:

You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#32989) | Reply to Group | Reply to Sender | Mute This Topic | New Topic
Your Subscription | Contact Group Owner | Unsubscribe [newarmyguitar24@gmail.com]

_._,_._,_

Re: [electricboats] Pocket Trawler Electrification

Hi Carsten & Paul,

 

Yes, fixed pods mounted so the props are in the same vertical plane as the current prop.  The side-mount controls just refer to the controls that came "free" with the purchase, as opposed to the top-mount dual control.  The dual control would be ideal I guess, but it does provide a single point of failure in a system that otherwise provides complete separation and redundancy.  The image below is near-enough to scale showing where the pods will hang on the hull.  My plan is to tuck them in as tight as reasonable against the full keel to 1) help protect them from striking anything, and 2) to keep the prop wash as close as possible to the single rudder that will remain.  I'm not worried about low-speed maneuverability as the boat does have a bow thruster.

 

Inside the hull above the pod mounting locations I will laminate in watertight bulkheads and covers to protect against flooding should I ever tear a pod clean off the hull.  Highly unlikely in the Great Lakes with a boat that draws 2.5', but easy enough to do and I'll be adding thickness on the inside of the hull where the pods mount, so a few more pieces while the epoxy is mixed won't be much trouble.

 

Lars

 

 

Re: [electricboats] Pocket Trawler Electrification

Sorry Paul, but your not Lars...

On Friday, 30 January 2026 at 22:15:53 CET, Paul J. Thompson via groups.io <bathroomdirectit=gmail.com@groups.io> wrote:

PODs will be fixed....

--
Regards,

Paul J. Thompson
IT Manager - Bathroom Direct
(W)09 913 3110 (Mob)021 275 5001 (txt only please)

On Sat, 31 Jan 2026, 10:10 Carsten via groups.io, <Carstensemail=yahoo.com@groups.io> wrote:

Well, Lars, let's get back to original emails.

I wanted to know if your pods will be mounted fixed in the hull bottom, or retracable.

You said that they would provide you some special things...

BR

Carsten

On Wednesday, 28 January 2026 at 21:18:05 CET, maaseidvaag via groups.io <maaseidvaag=yahoo.com@groups.io> wrote:

Hi Carsten,

 

Scroll up one post and you'll see a photo of the boat and the original drawing of the layout.  It's a Ted Brewer design called Blue Hill.  27 feet long, 9 foot beam, 6000 lbs displacement.  It's currently way overpowered with a Yanmar 4JH3E, 54hp.  I reach max reasonable cruising speed (about 80% of hull speed) at 1800 rpm, and even with 2" sound insulation from SoundDown, it's still unpleasantly loud on the boat while cruising.

 

The electric conversion will solve the sound problem and should give me plenty of range for my cruising on Lake Michigan and Lake Huron.

 

Lars

Re: [electricboats] Pocket Trawler Electrification

PODs will be fixed....

--
Regards,

Paul J. Thompson
IT Manager - Bathroom Direct
(W)09 913 3110 (Mob)021 275 5001 (txt only please)

On Sat, 31 Jan 2026, 10:10 Carsten via groups.io, <Carstensemail=yahoo.com@groups.io> wrote:

Well, Lars, let's get back to original emails.

I wanted to know if your pods will be mounted fixed in the hull bottom, or retracable.

You said that they would provide you some special things...

BR

Carsten

On Wednesday, 28 January 2026 at 21:18:05 CET, maaseidvaag via groups.io <maaseidvaag=yahoo.com@groups.io> wrote:

Hi Carsten,

 

Scroll up one post and you'll see a photo of the boat and the original drawing of the layout.  It's a Ted Brewer design called Blue Hill.  27 feet long, 9 foot beam, 6000 lbs displacement.  It's currently way overpowered with a Yanmar 4JH3E, 54hp.  I reach max reasonable cruising speed (about 80% of hull speed) at 1800 rpm, and even with 2" sound insulation from SoundDown, it's still unpleasantly loud on the boat while cruising.

 

The electric conversion will solve the sound problem and should give me plenty of range for my cruising on Lake Michigan and Lake Huron.

 

Lars

_._,_._,_

---

Groups.io Links:

You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#32986) | Reply to Group | Reply to Sender | Mute This Topic | New Topic
Your Subscription | Contact Group Owner | Unsubscribe [newarmyguitar24@gmail.com]

_._,_._,_

Re: [electricboats] Pocket Trawler Electrification

Well, Lars, let's get back to original emails.

I wanted to know if your pods will be mounted fixed in the hull bottom, or retracable.

You said that they would provide you some special things...

BR

Carsten

On Wednesday, 28 January 2026 at 21:18:05 CET, maaseidvaag via groups.io <maaseidvaag=yahoo.com@groups.io> wrote:

Hi Carsten,

 

Scroll up one post and you'll see a photo of the boat and the original drawing of the layout.  It's a Ted Brewer design called Blue Hill.  27 feet long, 9 foot beam, 6000 lbs displacement.  It's currently way overpowered with a Yanmar 4JH3E, 54hp.  I reach max reasonable cruising speed (about 80% of hull speed) at 1800 rpm, and even with 2" sound insulation from SoundDown, it's still unpleasantly loud on the boat while cruising.

 

The electric conversion will solve the sound problem and should give me plenty of range for my cruising on Lake Michigan and Lake Huron.

 

Lars